Opened 2 years ago
Closed 13 months ago
#1287 closed defect (fixed)
BoA: fix behaviour of "content" field
Reported by: | pferreir | Owned by: | aavilesd |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | v1.9 |
Component: | General | Version: | 1.1 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
The "content" field is the only one that gets displayed in the Book of Abstracts. This causes a problem, since some people disable it, and then the abstracts show up empty.
We should perhaps include whatever abstract fields are added.
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by pferreir
- Milestone changed from v1.9 to v1.4
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by pferreir
- Milestone changed from v1.4 to v1.2
- Owner set to arescope
- Status changed from new to assigned
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by jbenito
- Milestone changed from v1.2 to v1.3
comment:4 Changed 18 months ago by arescope
- Milestone changed from v2.1 to v1.9
comment:5 Changed 18 months ago by arescope
- Owner arescope deleted
- Status changed from assigned to new
comment:6 Changed 14 months ago by pferreir
- Owner set to aavilesd
- Status changed from new to assigned
comment:7 Changed 14 months ago by aavilesd
- Status changed from assigned to in_work
comment:8 Changed 14 months ago by aavilesd
- Status changed from in_work to awaiting_merge
comment:9 Changed 13 months ago by pferreir
- Status changed from awaiting_merge to merging
Merged in 90a09f1bb72d1d0ce5f44248804058284f19af89
comment:10 Changed 13 months ago by pferreir
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from merging to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
https://github.com/OmeGak/indico/tree/1287-abstract-fields